Latest

West Ham’s ‘Short Termism’ Looks Set To Continue

|

Allardyce SamReports this week have suggested that West Ham will not try to sign Liverpool’s Andy Carroll at the end of the season, but will instead turn their attention to Southampton striker Rickie Lambert. This shift in focus highlights the Hammers’ current culture of caring only about the here and now.

 

The amount of goals scored by Carroll and Lambert so far this season – three and 12 respectively – suggest the move would be a wise one for West Ham, for whom finding the net has proven to be persistently problematic.

 

Forever West Ham is now on Google+, so be sure to find us on there by quite simply (and rather unsurprisingly) searching ‘Forever West Ham’

 

The price tags of Carroll (estimated at £17m) and Lambert (estimated at £6m) also indicate signing the latter would be better business for the debt-ridden east Londoners.

However, although Carroll’s precociousness makes it difficult to realise at times, the long-haired loanee from Liverpool is a young player with a bright future still ahead of him.

Carroll has only recently turned 24, making him over seven years younger than Lambert, who, at 31, cannot be expected to play at the top level for many more years.

Carroll does, of course, have his critics. They are quick to say that the striker does not score enough, and, with a goal ratio of less than one in every four games, they may be right. But Carroll is the kind of player who provides more for the team than just goals; his hold-up play is superb and gives West Ham a viable attacking option as well as a ‘get out’ when needing to relieve pressure at the back.

Shelling out £17m for a goalscorer who does not score many goals and is regularly sidelined is not a wise move though, especially for a club in the Hammers’ precarious financial position.

But for West Ham – the supposed ‘Academy of Football’ – to turn its back on a young English talent really does show that the culture shift Sam Allardyce has brought to Upton Park extends well beyond the pitch.

Are you on Facebook? Excellent, so are we http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/ForeverWestHamcom/200938616608282

Some may say this is a good thing. They will back up that suggestion by referring to the way Big Sam got West Ham back into the Premier League at the first time of asking, before sealing their argument with how the Hammers boss appears to have secured another season in the top flight with the win at Stoke last week. They may even throw in a few derisive remarks about the shaky pre-Allardyce West Ham; mentioning Avram, Zola, et al, while they’re at it.

 

Nevertheless, fans should realise that Allardyce is West Ham’s short-termism incarnate. He was, after all, brought in to get the club ‘back where we belong’ and steady the ship once it has sailed away from the shark infested waters outside of the Premier League.

And that is all.

There has been little or no indication from the board or Allardyce about what will become of the manager if and when he has managed to establish West Ham as a club that is to remain among England’s elite.

Big Sam is nothing more than a stop-gap for the Hammers. Once his target has been met, it is almost guaranteed that David Sullivan, David Gold and Karen Brady will not hesitate to replace Allardyce with a manager that will get the team back to playing the ‘West Ham way’.

Why then, should West Ham shell out a frighteningly large sum of money for Andy Carroll, who is Big Sam’s ‘kind of player’? A permanent deal for Carroll would surely show that Allardyce, or at least his culture of football, has a long-term future at the club, wouldn’t it?

The answer is, quite simply, no. It would merely show that the gap Allardyce is stopping is wider than first thought.

The fact that Carroll was brought to West Ham on a loan deal shows the initial idea behind getting the player was a short-term one. There was the saving grace, however, that the deal had been made with the intention of making it a permanent one, thereby offering West Ham fans the belief that the future of their club was in safe hands. Now that the permanence appears to have evaporated, the Hammers look like they do not know where they are going.

Looking for experience? Just want to be heard outside of the Boleyn? We are currently looking for writers, drop us an email at foreverwestham@snack-media.com for more details

West Ham have gone from being the club with the excellent youth policy and grand designs for the future, to the one that is too scared to look beyond its own nose.

Follow me on Twitter: @JoellBlogs

Share this article

7 comments

  • Bill says:

    I said at the time of Carroll’s loan and agreed sale that West Ham would renege on the deal. Liverpool were left without a second striker until January because of it, wether he suited the system or not. He was chased by West Ham not the other way round. who’d trust dealing with them now?

    • james says:

      They are backing out of the deal, because the lad can’t score. Do you think they’d be backing out if he had banged in 15 plus, or at least wasn’t injured twice? I don’t think it reflects on any future dealings.

  • Dan O'Brien says:

    True in some ways Bill. The 2 Daves and Karen are hardened business people and they wouldn’t let a little thing like telling the truth get in the way of a good deal. It was clear from day 1 that we would never buy Carroll. With Allerdyces future at Upton Park not clarified then I’m sure Liverpool knew that Andys future here was uncertain too. With all the loan deals being done, it is clear that Sams future at West Ham will only last until May. Also I cannot see the hammers signing Ricky Lambert. Almost 31 and a figure of 6M being spoken of. That is outlandish money for someone of that age. I cannot figure how West Ham will encourage investment if the present board are only interested in mantaining our mid table security. Any possible investor would be looking for growth and profit and that is not going to be on our agenda for a few seasons…..if ever.

  • Darren says:

    I think it more likely they will sign a striker from a relegated team (assuming we stay up), such as
    Remy
    Bent
    Bentekee

  • The Cat says:

    Airy fairy article based on speculation!

    It was Big Sam that went all out to get Carroll here in the first place (“young english talent”)…..It hasn’t been a rip roaring success, but it was the lift the club and team needed at the time!
    If it had been a blinding success, £17M would’ve been a snip. Try before you buy….great move by all concerned!

    This club was on the floor when Big Sam got here and slowly but surely he is turning this around. There was NO youth progression or loaning experience for our academy…. he’s now got it up and running and he has given our younger talented players a route.

    DON’T sue speculation to beat Big Sam with as your arguments are weak!

    Poor thread!

    • USA Dave says:

      I have to agree 100% with Cat. Getting Liverpool to agree to the 17 million option was a very good piece of business. If AC had scored goals we would have looked like we stealing him at that price.

      I happen to think he is STILL worth it and that we should exercise the option, although it seems that the board has decided against it. I do wonder if there remains a possibility of letting the option expire and then offering less. If AC wants to stay he may force Liverpool’s hand. But that is probably a pipe dream.

  • james says:

    If Sam wants a big guy up front, we should have got Joselu from Madrid for 4m. Has had a couple of prolific seasons (albeit at lower level), is 6’3″ and at 22 years old has plenty of time on his hands. Hasn’t scored a ton in Germany, but has still been very useful on the pitch.

Comments are closed.