When speaking about the signing of Pablo Fornals, Cottee revealed it was great to see the club buying players for £24million rather than £4million as it shows where the club are at.
“Hopefully it’s going to be a really good signing for the club, and again we’re not buying players for £4m now, we’re buying players for £24m and that shows you where the club are,” wrote Cottee in an interview with West Ham’s official website.
However surely Cottee should know that a player’s price tag is no indication of quality, and while it can suggest ambition to splash the cash, it’s better to get the right type of players through the door rather than marquee signings.
For example, while Felipe Anderson, who cost £36million (Source: BBC), and Issa Diop, who cost £22million (Source: BBC), saw the Hammers splash the cash and both succeeded, were they any more important then Fabian Balbuena and Lukasz Fabianski?
Sky Sports claimed that the Hammers only spent £6.5million on Balbuena, but the defender had a fantastic debut season at the club and helped his side improve at the back.
Balbuena had an impressive tackle success rate in his outings as he won 50% of the 40 tackles he made, he also made 52 successful interceptions and he cleared the ball from danger a staggering 172 times. (Source: Premier League)
The defender’s no-nonsense style helped the Hammers greatly and helped allow Diop to surge forward out of defence in order to aid his team, so he was a worthwhile signing despite his cheap price tag.
Then there’s Fabianski.
Yet he was arguably the club’s best and most important signing.
Fabianski featured 38 times in his latest season in the league, registering seven clean sheets and making a staggering 148 saves. (Source: Premier League)
So given that Balbuena and Fabianski impressed so much, and cost less than Diop and Anderson when their prices are added together; surely Cottee is naive to focus on the amount of money being spent rather than the players themselves.